The Scientists Responsible for “The Out Of Africa Theory” Admit They Were Wrong, Are We Even Listening?

The Scientists Responsible for “The Out Of Africa Theory” Admit They Were Wrong, Are We Even Listening?

They were wrong and had the integrity to admit that mistake and tidy up the bad research and errors made.

“Australian scientists say analysis of the oldest DNA ever taken from skeletal remains challenges the theory that all modern humans can trace their recent ancestry to Africa.

What our evidence shows is that the situation is much more complicated than any of these supporters of Out of Africa would have imagined

Dr Alan Thorne, Australian National University

The study is based on the 60,000-year-old so-called Mungo Man skeleton, which was unearthed in New South Wales in 1974, and nine other anatomically modern Australian individuals who lived 8-15,000 years ago.” http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/1108413.stm

 

Australian historian Greg Jefferys explains that, “The whole ‘Out of Africa’ myth has its roots in the mainstream academic campaign in the 1990′s to remove the concept of Race. When I did my degree they all spent a lot of time on the ‘Out of Africa’ thing but it’s been completely disproved by genetics. Mainstream still hold on to it.”

It did begin the early 90’s. And the academics most responsible for cementing both the Out-of Africa theory and the complementary common ancestral African mother – given the name of “Eve” – in the public arena and nearly every curriculum, were Professors Alan C. Wilson and Rebecca L. Cann.

In their defense, the authors of this paper were fully aware that genealogy is not in any way linked to geography, and that their placement of Eve in Africa was an assumption, never an assertion.

In addition to the references supplied by Mossling and wolfhnd, the skeletons being excavated here in Australia appear to be rising from their graves to be throwing more confusion into the story.

Mungo Man (In New South Wales) so far appears to be standing up to his story that he was hanging out about 60,000 years ago and that he was a genuine Homo sapiens sapiens.

But a couple of other skeletons are throwing spanners into the works from their graves. On the following web site, you can see a claim that Australian Aborigenes arose 400,00 years ago from two distinct lineages.

 

“Rebecca Cann decided to delve deeper and sample the Australian Original mtDNA genes herself (which is passed on from generation to generation by women). What she found literally turned the whole Homo sapien sapiens tree upside down. Based on a mitochondrial DNA sampling “of 112 humans, including twelve Australian Aborigines” she had no choice but to contradict their earlier paper conceding that “mitochondrial DNA puts the origin of Homo sapiens much further back and indicates that the Australian Aborigines arose 400,000 years ago from two distinct lineages, far earlier than any other racial type”. Instead of exhibiting one third the genetic diversity of other races, which was a crucial element of their earlier paper’s self-regulation, it would seem their initial comparison to the African race was wrong by a factor of 30.

 

“What she found was that the “Australian racial group has a much higher number of mutations”, and that this trend runs contrary to a predicted rate of one third to that of any other race. Moreover, “by the same theory, the Mongoloids originated about 100,000 years ago, and the Negroid and Caucasian groups about 40,000 years ago”. Employing Cann’s calculations we now find that the Original people came into existence 400,000 years ago, eight times earlier than what they proposed in their paper, and instead of exhibiting one third the genetic diversity of the Africans they actually have a mutation rate ten times greater than the Africans. This amounts to a genetic miscalculation by a factor of 30, and the timing mechanism of their molecular clock, if Cann’s research was valid, is now in tatters.”

http://www.ancient-origins.net/opinion-guest-authors-human-origins-science/out-africa-yesterday-australia-today-and-pleiades-0

 

To complicate the picture further, we have this report of a colony of aboriginals at Kow Swamp in north western Victoria

 

“By 1972 the skeletons of nearly 40 individuals had been uncovered around the edge of Kow Swamp, mostly along the eastern shore, in a narrow belt of lake silt. This silt was partially overlain by a crescentic sand dune (lunette). Radiocarbon dates from bone and charcoal associated with the burials, show that the burials span a period from about 13000 to 9500 BP.

 

”The enigma of Kow Swamp is that the skulls are younger than those at Keilor and Willandra Lakes, but appear much more archaic. The people at Kow Swamp had large, long heads with very thick bone, up to 13 mm thick. Their faces were large, wide and projecting, with prominent brow ridges and flat, receding foreheads. From above they show a pronounced inward curvature behind the eye sockets, giving the skull the appearance of a flask. They had enormous teeth and jaws, some even larger than Java Man, Homo erectus (Previously called Pithecanthropus, from the middle Pleistocene of Sangiran.

 

“The appearance of the skulls at Kow Swamp suggest they were physically similar to those at Cohuna and Talgai (These were nearby –my comment). This contrasts strongly with the more gracile appearance of the inhabitants of Keilor and WLH 1 (LM1) & WLH 3 (LM3). The gracile people lack the flat, receding foreheads, pronounced brow ridges, massive jaws and thick bone of the Kow Swamp people.”

 

One anthropologist claims that only two skulls were reconstructed somewhat intact and that most of the above claims of similarities with earlier species were due to artefactual misshaping over time. http://austhrutime.com/kow_swamp.htm

 

Anatole Klyosov – The Out of Africa Myth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f66h_2dRcWs

 

Early Humans Lived in China 1.7 Million Years Ago

https://www.livescience.com/38917-early-humans-lived-in-china.html

 

DNA confirms coastal trek to Australia

http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2009/07/24/2635149.htm

 

Wandering the world

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/09/10/1094789687569.html

 

Human evolution

https://www.britannica.com/science/human-evolution

 

Human Evolution Timeline Interactive

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-evolution-timeline-interactive

 

 

Further Information:

The exodus of the first Original Homo sapiens sapiens begun hundreds of thousands of years ago and spread to all parts of the Indo-Pacific Rim. The problem is that no matter how strong the evidence supplied through genetics and bones, the very best we will get from official channels is that this is all ancient history, even if it did happen, it is a story is long gone. Today’s attitude towards history has a time-line that begins when humans began to gather yet again into concentrated clusters of settlement around 7,000 years ago. Whatever happened earlier, just doesn’t register on the historical radar. Before that historic turning point there is talk of caves and a nomadic lifestyle overlaid with innuendos suggesting a less intelligent hairy clientele. With no building, metropolis or machinery to admire these assumed sins of technological omission have sadly lead to a situation where what happened then is no longer relevant, and somewhat of an embarrassment. Therefore, if the Original people were prominent in ancient world affairs, it merely comes from a less informed and intelligent setting, and fortunately we have moved forward since then.

Moreover, if the Original people had sailed to distant locations there should be archaeological proof in print. A simple inspection of any accredited text or academic book will find no entry that supports such a radical proposition. So with no published proof of earlier Original mariners sailing the globe, and if by some remote chance it did occur, having taken place in less cultured and cruder times, either way such an event is of less consequence.

Those objections are wrong on so many levels, the most pressing error relates to timing.

 

This may surprise many, but the truth of the matter is that there is a bounty of rigorous science which has identified solid connections through Original mitochondrial DNA, Y Chromosomes, historical records and cranial measurements to people who were, or still are, living in North America, South America, Mongolia, Siberia, Japan, Malaysia, Andaman Islands and India.

 

The researchers in Spain have genetically identified relatives “to early Neandertals” (4) which has been dated at 430,000 years old. Because of this sensational date they were forced to concede that the early divergence of hominid strands occurred 550,000 to 750,000 years ago.

 

Fire Stick Farming Evidence Goes Back 186,000 years

 

To an extent all of the drama and parting of the ways begins with a scientific paper published twenty-five years ago by Professor Allan Wilson and Rebecca Cann titled, “The Recent African Genesis of Humans.

 

Before the beginning of the last decade of the twentieth century both Cann and Wilson had recanted and were certain that it was in Australia, not Africa, humanity came into existence. The reason is simple, both of them had not personally examined Original blood and relied on genetic assumptions they found were false. Their paper and the ‘molecular clock’ they posted was reliant upon two assumptions that pertained only to the Original race: that their mtDNA is the youngest and least diverse (one-third that of the African mtDNA) and a belief that Australia was uninhabited until settled by Africans 50-60,000 years ago.

They were wrong and had the integrity to admit that mistake and tidy up the bad research and errors made. Cann was the first to see the error of their ways and in a sampling of the blood of “112 humans, including twelve Australian Aborigines (sic), all from Western Australia.” (65) She found that “mitochondrial DNA puts the origin of Homo sapiens much further back and indicates that the Australian Aborigines (sic) arose 400,000 years ago from two distinct lineages, far earlier than any other racial group.”

 

The Russian researchers of Y Chromosomes are adamant that Adam is not African, which is merely the male version of the same female story. What has to be understood is that in combination all of these genetic studies cannot supply latitude and longitude, but it can give certainty in one exclusion, in that there is one continent where humanity did not evolve. All of this adds up to one absolute minus, Africa, and a possible plus, Australia

 

For our critics to prevail in this debate Chris Stringer reluctantly admits must take place, all twelve steps have to be fully discredited for the Out-of-Africa theory to remain on its pedestal.

 

The awkward part of that hypothetical debate is that if Stringer was asked to adjudicate, he would have to decline and declare his bias towards the anti-Out-of-Africa camp. Since it was his paper and speech that openly challenged the accepted date and place in such unequivocal terms, Stringer must remain consistent to his own research and cast his vote against Africa and look elsewhere for an alternative.

 

Can we suggest to Stringer that in seeking a new set of global parameters he should first consult the Original Custodians of what is agreed to be the oldest culture in the world. A few words of guidance and context from a spokesperson of the First Day will provide the clarity in direction that is now lost in the genetic haze.

 

“They say we have been here for 60,000 years, but it is much longer. We have been here since the time before time began. We have come directly out of the Dreamtime of the great Creative Ancestors. We have lived and kept the earth as it was on the First Day. All other peoples of the world came from us.

 

 

 

Klaatsch feels even though humanity’s base is Australia, the Original people did not progress intellectually and stagnated in their primitive ways and ignorance. It seems Klaatsch has no more respect for the Original cousins, dismissing them as being of the same stock and lacking in redeeming features. “The question is still full of puzzles, especially as regards the Yahgans of Tierra del Fuego, whose very primitive physical and cultural features remind us of the lowest known races of the Old World.” We have learnt that whenever Klaatsch refers to what he believes to be the lowest or most primitive race in his book, that is ‘Klaatsch-speak’ for the Australian Original people.

 

Todays attitude towards history has a time-line that begins when humans began to gather yet again into concentrated clusters of settlement around 7,000 years ago. Whatever happened earlier, just doesn’t register on the historical radar. Before that historic turning point there is talk of caves and a nomadic lifestyle overlaid with innuendos suggesting a less intelligent hairy clientele. With no building, metropolis or machinery to admire these assumed sins of technological omission have sadly lead to a situation where what happened then is no longer relevant, and somewhat of an embarrassment.

 

Therefore, if the Original people were prominent in ancient world affairs, it merely comes from a less informed and intelligent setting, and fortunately we have moved forward since then.

 

Moreover, if the Original people had sailed to distant locations there should be archaeological proof in print. A simple inspection of any accredited text or academic book will find no entry that supports such a radical proposition. So with no published proof of earlier Original mariners sailing the globe, and if by some remote chance it did occur, having taken place in less cultured and cruder times, either way such an event is of less consequence.

Those objections are wrong on so many levels, the most pressing error relates to timing. The critics are assuming that if any contact did take place, the genetic evidence is long gone and view any associated mathematics beginning with four noughts and more.

 

We disagree, there is enough science to prove our theory but the official channels will not publish of course.

 

Research sited in article by:

Highly respected archaeologist, Jim Bowler

US scientist Anatole Klyosov

Russian researcher Igor Rozhanskii

Russian Researcher Robert Lindsay

Brazilian anthropologist Dr. Walter Neves

Professor Augusto Cardich (University De La Plata)

German physician, anatomist, physical anthropologist, evolutionist, and professor Dr. Hermann Klaatsch

Dr Raghavendra Rao from the Anthropological Survey of India

David Reich (Harvard Medical School, Professor of Genetics)

Mexican geologist Dr. Silvia Gonzales

Professor Clive Gamble of Southampton University

Author Lowell Ponte

Professor of Biochemistry Allan Wilson

Professor in the Department of Cell and Molecular Biology at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa. Rebecca Cann

British physical anthropologist Chris Stringer (London Natural History Museum)

 

Main source:  http://forgottenorigin.com/2809-2

Advertisements

1 Comment (+add yours?)

  1. Judy
    Nov 19, 2017 @ 06:13:22

    Reblogged this on judithwill56 and commented:
    Are you willing to live life challenging those concepts and theories you were taught in school and further on.?
    Keep thinking, keep challenging and updating you thinking. Never forget that a huge amount of what you learned as “facts” gets adjusted and edited and even disproven with new research.
    The more years you have on your age clock the more you are challenged to keep renewing those hard wired beliefs you cling to.
    Keep thinking. This blog post is a good one to start with.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: