The Scientists Responsible for “The Out Of Africa Theory” Admit They Were Wrong, Are We Even Listening?

The Scientists Responsible for “The Out Of Africa Theory” Admit They Were Wrong, Are We Even Listening?

They were wrong and had the integrity to admit that mistake and tidy up the bad research and errors made.

“Australian scientists say analysis of the oldest DNA ever taken from skeletal remains challenges the theory that all modern humans can trace their recent ancestry to Africa.

What our evidence shows is that the situation is much more complicated than any of these supporters of Out of Africa would have imagined

Dr Alan Thorne, Australian National University

The study is based on the 60,000-year-old so-called Mungo Man skeleton, which was unearthed in New South Wales in 1974, and nine other anatomically modern Australian individuals who lived 8-15,000 years ago.” http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/1108413.stm

 

Australian historian Greg Jefferys explains that, “The whole ‘Out of Africa’ myth has its roots in the mainstream academic campaign in the 1990′s to remove the concept of Race. When I did my degree they all spent a lot of time on the ‘Out of Africa’ thing but it’s been completely disproved by genetics. Mainstream still hold on to it.”

It did begin the early 90’s. And the academics most responsible for cementing both the Out-of Africa theory and the complementary common ancestral African mother – given the name of “Eve” – in the public arena and nearly every curriculum, were Professors Alan C. Wilson and Rebecca L. Cann.

In their defense, the authors of this paper were fully aware that genealogy is not in any way linked to geography, and that their placement of Eve in Africa was an assumption, never an assertion.

In addition to the references supplied by Mossling and wolfhnd, the skeletons being excavated here in Australia appear to be rising from their graves to be throwing more confusion into the story.

Mungo Man (In New South Wales) so far appears to be standing up to his story that he was hanging out about 60,000 years ago and that he was a genuine Homo sapiens sapiens.

But a couple of other skeletons are throwing spanners into the works from their graves. On the following web site, you can see a claim that Australian Aborigenes arose 400,00 years ago from two distinct lineages.

 

“Rebecca Cann decided to delve deeper and sample the Australian Original mtDNA genes herself (which is passed on from generation to generation by women). What she found literally turned the whole Homo sapien sapiens tree upside down. Based on a mitochondrial DNA sampling “of 112 humans, including twelve Australian Aborigines” she had no choice but to contradict their earlier paper conceding that “mitochondrial DNA puts the origin of Homo sapiens much further back and indicates that the Australian Aborigines arose 400,000 years ago from two distinct lineages, far earlier than any other racial type”. Instead of exhibiting one third the genetic diversity of other races, which was a crucial element of their earlier paper’s self-regulation, it would seem their initial comparison to the African race was wrong by a factor of 30.

 

“What she found was that the “Australian racial group has a much higher number of mutations”, and that this trend runs contrary to a predicted rate of one third to that of any other race. Moreover, “by the same theory, the Mongoloids originated about 100,000 years ago, and the Negroid and Caucasian groups about 40,000 years ago”. Employing Cann’s calculations we now find that the Original people came into existence 400,000 years ago, eight times earlier than what they proposed in their paper, and instead of exhibiting one third the genetic diversity of the Africans they actually have a mutation rate ten times greater than the Africans. This amounts to a genetic miscalculation by a factor of 30, and the timing mechanism of their molecular clock, if Cann’s research was valid, is now in tatters.”

http://www.ancient-origins.net/opinion-guest-authors-human-origins-science/out-africa-yesterday-australia-today-and-pleiades-0

 

To complicate the picture further, we have this report of a colony of aboriginals at Kow Swamp in north western Victoria

 

“By 1972 the skeletons of nearly 40 individuals had been uncovered around the edge of Kow Swamp, mostly along the eastern shore, in a narrow belt of lake silt. This silt was partially overlain by a crescentic sand dune (lunette). Radiocarbon dates from bone and charcoal associated with the burials, show that the burials span a period from about 13000 to 9500 BP.

 

”The enigma of Kow Swamp is that the skulls are younger than those at Keilor and Willandra Lakes, but appear much more archaic. The people at Kow Swamp had large, long heads with very thick bone, up to 13 mm thick. Their faces were large, wide and projecting, with prominent brow ridges and flat, receding foreheads. From above they show a pronounced inward curvature behind the eye sockets, giving the skull the appearance of a flask. They had enormous teeth and jaws, some even larger than Java Man, Homo erectus (Previously called Pithecanthropus, from the middle Pleistocene of Sangiran.

 

“The appearance of the skulls at Kow Swamp suggest they were physically similar to those at Cohuna and Talgai (These were nearby –my comment). This contrasts strongly with the more gracile appearance of the inhabitants of Keilor and WLH 1 (LM1) & WLH 3 (LM3). The gracile people lack the flat, receding foreheads, pronounced brow ridges, massive jaws and thick bone of the Kow Swamp people.”

 

One anthropologist claims that only two skulls were reconstructed somewhat intact and that most of the above claims of similarities with earlier species were due to artefactual misshaping over time. http://austhrutime.com/kow_swamp.htm

 

Anatole Klyosov – The Out of Africa Myth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f66h_2dRcWs

 

Early Humans Lived in China 1.7 Million Years Ago

https://www.livescience.com/38917-early-humans-lived-in-china.html

 

DNA confirms coastal trek to Australia

http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2009/07/24/2635149.htm

 

Wandering the world

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/09/10/1094789687569.html

 

Human evolution

https://www.britannica.com/science/human-evolution

 

Human Evolution Timeline Interactive

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-evolution-timeline-interactive

 

 

Further Information:

The exodus of the first Original Homo sapiens sapiens begun hundreds of thousands of years ago and spread to all parts of the Indo-Pacific Rim. The problem is that no matter how strong the evidence supplied through genetics and bones, the very best we will get from official channels is that this is all ancient history, even if it did happen, it is a story is long gone. Today’s attitude towards history has a time-line that begins when humans began to gather yet again into concentrated clusters of settlement around 7,000 years ago. Whatever happened earlier, just doesn’t register on the historical radar. Before that historic turning point there is talk of caves and a nomadic lifestyle overlaid with innuendos suggesting a less intelligent hairy clientele. With no building, metropolis or machinery to admire these assumed sins of technological omission have sadly lead to a situation where what happened then is no longer relevant, and somewhat of an embarrassment. Therefore, if the Original people were prominent in ancient world affairs, it merely comes from a less informed and intelligent setting, and fortunately we have moved forward since then.

Moreover, if the Original people had sailed to distant locations there should be archaeological proof in print. A simple inspection of any accredited text or academic book will find no entry that supports such a radical proposition. So with no published proof of earlier Original mariners sailing the globe, and if by some remote chance it did occur, having taken place in less cultured and cruder times, either way such an event is of less consequence.

Those objections are wrong on so many levels, the most pressing error relates to timing.

 

This may surprise many, but the truth of the matter is that there is a bounty of rigorous science which has identified solid connections through Original mitochondrial DNA, Y Chromosomes, historical records and cranial measurements to people who were, or still are, living in North America, South America, Mongolia, Siberia, Japan, Malaysia, Andaman Islands and India.

 

The researchers in Spain have genetically identified relatives “to early Neandertals” (4) which has been dated at 430,000 years old. Because of this sensational date they were forced to concede that the early divergence of hominid strands occurred 550,000 to 750,000 years ago.

 

Fire Stick Farming Evidence Goes Back 186,000 years

 

To an extent all of the drama and parting of the ways begins with a scientific paper published twenty-five years ago by Professor Allan Wilson and Rebecca Cann titled, “The Recent African Genesis of Humans.

 

Before the beginning of the last decade of the twentieth century both Cann and Wilson had recanted and were certain that it was in Australia, not Africa, humanity came into existence. The reason is simple, both of them had not personally examined Original blood and relied on genetic assumptions they found were false. Their paper and the ‘molecular clock’ they posted was reliant upon two assumptions that pertained only to the Original race: that their mtDNA is the youngest and least diverse (one-third that of the African mtDNA) and a belief that Australia was uninhabited until settled by Africans 50-60,000 years ago.

They were wrong and had the integrity to admit that mistake and tidy up the bad research and errors made. Cann was the first to see the error of their ways and in a sampling of the blood of “112 humans, including twelve Australian Aborigines (sic), all from Western Australia.” (65) She found that “mitochondrial DNA puts the origin of Homo sapiens much further back and indicates that the Australian Aborigines (sic) arose 400,000 years ago from two distinct lineages, far earlier than any other racial group.”

 

The Russian researchers of Y Chromosomes are adamant that Adam is not African, which is merely the male version of the same female story. What has to be understood is that in combination all of these genetic studies cannot supply latitude and longitude, but it can give certainty in one exclusion, in that there is one continent where humanity did not evolve. All of this adds up to one absolute minus, Africa, and a possible plus, Australia

 

For our critics to prevail in this debate Chris Stringer reluctantly admits must take place, all twelve steps have to be fully discredited for the Out-of-Africa theory to remain on its pedestal.

 

The awkward part of that hypothetical debate is that if Stringer was asked to adjudicate, he would have to decline and declare his bias towards the anti-Out-of-Africa camp. Since it was his paper and speech that openly challenged the accepted date and place in such unequivocal terms, Stringer must remain consistent to his own research and cast his vote against Africa and look elsewhere for an alternative.

 

Can we suggest to Stringer that in seeking a new set of global parameters he should first consult the Original Custodians of what is agreed to be the oldest culture in the world. A few words of guidance and context from a spokesperson of the First Day will provide the clarity in direction that is now lost in the genetic haze.

 

“They say we have been here for 60,000 years, but it is much longer. We have been here since the time before time began. We have come directly out of the Dreamtime of the great Creative Ancestors. We have lived and kept the earth as it was on the First Day. All other peoples of the world came from us.

 

 

 

Klaatsch feels even though humanity’s base is Australia, the Original people did not progress intellectually and stagnated in their primitive ways and ignorance. It seems Klaatsch has no more respect for the Original cousins, dismissing them as being of the same stock and lacking in redeeming features. “The question is still full of puzzles, especially as regards the Yahgans of Tierra del Fuego, whose very primitive physical and cultural features remind us of the lowest known races of the Old World.” We have learnt that whenever Klaatsch refers to what he believes to be the lowest or most primitive race in his book, that is ‘Klaatsch-speak’ for the Australian Original people.

 

Todays attitude towards history has a time-line that begins when humans began to gather yet again into concentrated clusters of settlement around 7,000 years ago. Whatever happened earlier, just doesn’t register on the historical radar. Before that historic turning point there is talk of caves and a nomadic lifestyle overlaid with innuendos suggesting a less intelligent hairy clientele. With no building, metropolis or machinery to admire these assumed sins of technological omission have sadly lead to a situation where what happened then is no longer relevant, and somewhat of an embarrassment.

 

Therefore, if the Original people were prominent in ancient world affairs, it merely comes from a less informed and intelligent setting, and fortunately we have moved forward since then.

 

Moreover, if the Original people had sailed to distant locations there should be archaeological proof in print. A simple inspection of any accredited text or academic book will find no entry that supports such a radical proposition. So with no published proof of earlier Original mariners sailing the globe, and if by some remote chance it did occur, having taken place in less cultured and cruder times, either way such an event is of less consequence.

Those objections are wrong on so many levels, the most pressing error relates to timing. The critics are assuming that if any contact did take place, the genetic evidence is long gone and view any associated mathematics beginning with four noughts and more.

 

We disagree, there is enough science to prove our theory but the official channels will not publish of course.

 

Research sited in article by:

Highly respected archaeologist, Jim Bowler

US scientist Anatole Klyosov

Russian researcher Igor Rozhanskii

Russian Researcher Robert Lindsay

Brazilian anthropologist Dr. Walter Neves

Professor Augusto Cardich (University De La Plata)

German physician, anatomist, physical anthropologist, evolutionist, and professor Dr. Hermann Klaatsch

Dr Raghavendra Rao from the Anthropological Survey of India

David Reich (Harvard Medical School, Professor of Genetics)

Mexican geologist Dr. Silvia Gonzales

Professor Clive Gamble of Southampton University

Author Lowell Ponte

Professor of Biochemistry Allan Wilson

Professor in the Department of Cell and Molecular Biology at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa. Rebecca Cann

British physical anthropologist Chris Stringer (London Natural History Museum)

 

Main source:  http://forgottenorigin.com/2809-2

Advertisements

 It was from Australia art, music, religion, democracy, astronomy, navigation, gender equality and all the nobler pursuits that enlighten, was exported so long ago.

Ancient Blackfulla Genes and Bones in South America, North America, Siberia, Mongolia, Japan, Malaysia, India …

By Steven and Evan Strong

We have already initiated proceedings through establishing an Australian foundation as the beginning place. The next step is to investigate nine locations/genetic sources which justify our belief that humanity began in Australia and that this genetic and esoteric seed was exported from Australia as Original mariners sailed throughout the Indo-Pacific Rim.

 

The exodus of the first Original Homo sapiens sapiens begun hundreds of thousands of years ago and spread to all parts of the Indo-Pacific Rim. The problem is that no matter how strong the evidence supplied through genetics and bones, the very best we will get from official channels is that this is all ancient history, even if it did happen, it is a story is long gone. Today’s attitude towards history has a time-line that begins when humans began to gather yet again into concentrated clusters of settlement around 7,000 years ago. Whatever happened earlier, just doesn’t register on the historical radar. Before that historic turning point there is talk of caves and a nomadic lifestyle overlaid with innuendos suggesting a less intelligent hairy clientele. With no building, metropolis or machinery to admire these assumed sins of technological omission have sadly lead to a situation where what happened then is no longer relevant, and somewhat of an embarrassment. Therefore, if the Original people were prominent in ancient world affairs, it merely comes from a less informed and intelligent setting, and fortunately we have moved forward since then.

Moreover, if the Original people had sailed to distant locations there should be archaeological proof in print. A simple inspection of any accredited text or academic book will find no entry that supports such a radical proposition. So with no published proof of earlier Original mariners sailing the globe, and if by some remote chance it did occur, having taken place in less cultured and cruder times, either way such an event is of less consequence.

Those objections are wrong on so many levels, the most pressing error relates to timing.

Twelve Steps Towards the Original Truth

This may surprise many, but the truth of the matter is that there is a bounty of rigorous science which has identified solid connections through Original mitochondrial DNA, Y Chromosomes, historical records and cranial measurements to people who were, or still are, living in North America, South America, Mongolia, Siberia, Japan, Malaysia, Andaman Islands and India.

 

Step 1: The White Flag

 The Out of Africa Theory is False

The theory of modern humanity evolving in Africa between 150-200,000 years ago has been proven to be false.

The discovery of an ancestor to the Neanderthals, who was walking on this planet between 300-400,000 years ago in Spain, means that the accepted division of hominids that led to Neanderthals, Denisovans, Red Deer Cave Man, Homo Enigma and an assortment of related hominids had to take place not 200,000 years ago, as assumed, but more like 400,000-500,000 years ago. “That would mean that the ancestors of humans were already wandering down a solitary path apart from the other kinds of archaic humans on the planet 100,000 to 400,000 years earlier than expected.”

The researchers in Spain have genetically identified relatives “to early Neandertals” (4) which has been dated at 430,000 years old. Because of this sensational date they were forced to concede that the early divergence of hominid strands occurred 550,000 to 750,000 years ago.

 

Step 2: Point Ritchie-the Final Nail in the Coffin of the Out-of-Africa Theory

Fire Stick Farming Evidence Goes Back 186,000 years

Highly respected archaeologist, Jim Bowler, along with a host of mainstream experts, will assure any that ask that sometime between 50-60,000 years ago modern humans who sailed from Africa stepped ashore somewhere at the Top End, then slowly spread along the northern coast line of Australia.

Despite Bowler’s expectations material taken from a midden from Point Ritchie was reliably dated to be 80,000 to 90,000 years old.  What is a touch puzzling is that Bowler, along with Gurdup Singh and Peter Ouwendyke, presented a joint paper on their work on a core sample taken at the Great Barrier Reef in 1983 which they proposed dated human activity through fire-stick farming back to 186,000 years.

 

Ainu man.jpg

(Older Ainu Man in Japan)

Step 3: Original Plus Mongol Equals Ainu

The Ainu People Of Japan Have Original Genes

German anthropologist Dr. Hermann Klaatsch was adamant, that this (pictured) Elder has all the facial features, hair, physique and genes of an Original person. He also was convinced humanity began in Australia and that it was from Australia the first humans set off to other countries. the truth is that the Australoid is the dominant Asian phenotype. All Asians were Australoids until recently… clearly there are still some Australoids in SE Asia such as Negrito people of Malaysia, Thailand (Mani), The Philippines (the Agta) and Indonesia and the Senoi of Thailand but these are the minority.

A review of recent genetic study of the Ainu by researcher Robert Lindsay confirmed that “the Ainu are indeed cold adapted. Ainuid Australoid types were widespread over much of Asia from 9,000- 2,000 years.

Russian researchers diprove out of africa theory.jpg

Step 4: Adam Never Lived in Africa

 There is no African Genes in any male lineage outside of Africa

If Eve did by some remote chance live in Africa, then she had been involved in a long-distance relationship between continents, because Adam never walked one step in or near Africa. A recent and extensive study of the Y Chromosomes of males throughout the planet, of which the main focus was to test the validity of the Out-of-Africa theory, was unequivocal in determining that there is no African genetic input in the genesis of any male lineage outside Africa.

 

What the researchers found after comparing African and non-African male Y Chromosomes was that the findings “offers evidence to re-examine the validity of the “Out of Africa” concept.”  As far as they concerned the genetic credentials of this popular theory accounting for the emergence of Homo sapiens sapiens in Africa 150,000 to 200,000 years ago is in tatters. Their analysis of the data found that “a more plausible interpretation might have been that both current Africans and non-Africans descended separately from a more common ancient ancestor, thus providing a proverbial fork. A region where this downstream common ancestor arose would not necessarily be in Africa.

 

Step 5: Kissing Cousins

Is History Wrong? Were Originals Here 500,000 Years Ago?

At the turn of this century the proper noun Denisovan did not exist. Fifteen years later it is commonly accepted that outside the Neanderthals, they were the most widespread and numerous of the many non-sapien strands of hominids. First discovered just over a decade ago in Siberia, until some mtDNA was extracted from the finger of a female Denisovan thought to be about 30,000 years old, it was first regarded as an interesting off-shoot, but thought to have no direct relevance to modern humans.

The genetic analysis of this woman’s genetic make-up was totally unexpected, it now seems every human of today has a percentage of their DNA that directly matches. And in some cases, well one in particular, the identical genetic cross-over is not insignificant and has no earthly parallel. The Original people of Australia have between a 4-6% match to the Denisovan gene.

Whether comparing to the Neanderthal input or any other extinct hominid group the highest levels sit at just over 2%, up to three times that score is phenomenal.

How can the Original people, who are supposed to come into existence fifty to sixty thousand years ago in an isolated southern continent, be so closely and intimately related to hominids that are at least 500,000 years old? The numbers do not add up and common sense is the first casualty of this equation.

8-Aboriginal-rock-engraving-most-likely-of-an-ocean-going-watercraft-Copy-300x225.jpg

8 Aboriginal rock engraving most likely of an ocean going watercraft

 

Step 6: A Chilean History Lesson with a Mayan Sub-plot

Elders And Mystics Visited Australia From Around The World Thousands Of Years Ago

At every school in Chile when the children study their origins and ancient history, all are taught of a theory that espouses an Australian presence in Chile and throughout South America taking place tens of thousands of years ago. It is suggested that the Original mariners basically ‘hitched’ a ride on the ‘Roaring Forties.’ Under favourable conditions the children in Chilean classes are assured it would take less than a month to complete the first part of the journey and step upon the American continent.

Often Elders and mystics from America would make their way to Australia as pilgrims seeking tuition in the esoteric. The boat they occupied was completely sealed, without rudder or sails and left entirely to the timing and ocean currents. They took maize for food and as the boat was watertight and unsinkable, as long as the currents behaved as they had done so for millennia, the expectation was to make landfall somewhere near present-day Sydney.

It may be a coincidence, but we sincerely doubt it, that close to Gosford on a rock platform situated less than two hundred metres from the sea, there is a pecking of a boat with a high stern and bow needed to negotiate open seas and large waves. What was always of interest is what is missing, there is no sail, mast, upper cabin, rudder or any form of steering device.

4-Dravidian-Tamil-Genetic-Link-to-Australia-Copy.jpg

Dravidian Tamil Genetic Link to Australia

Step 7: Seven too Many

Same Ancient Song Sung In India and Same Genes

During research of mtDNA conducted in Southern India was part of a national survey, results revealed there was the presence of seven samples that exhibited distinct Australian Aboriginal genetic signatures.

When discussing this genetic science with an Original man of high education of both Black-fella and White-fella teachings, he shared with me an incident that took place when he was India. For reasons I can no longer remember, he needed to make his way deep into the forest of Southern India seeking time out from the noise and bustle of daily life, well away from any sign of civilisation. Now alone, he felt the need to make a private offering to nature and sing a secret sacred song he learnt from his father, who was from one of the desert tribes in the middle of Australia.

Not long after he began to sing this ancient song, the forest joined in. From all around he could hear the same words being sung in the correct order. Then the ‘bush men and women’ stepped out into the clearing and they stood as one in completing a sacred song that knows no boundaries, yet shares the same ancient Motherland.

 

Step 8: Twenty-two Tribes

Originals The Closest Cousins To the Tribes Deep In The Amazonian Jungle

A very recent genetic comparative study of some isolated Indigenous tribes found deep in the Amazonian jungle was meant to resolve questions about their closest connection and kin within the American continent. Being so remote and insular the genetic pool the Tupu and Ge-speaking tribes were considered to be as close as untouched as could be found.

The only certainty their paper can testify to is that Original people and genes were in America at a time with five figures. Dr. Walter Neves has 55 Original skulls found in Brazil and quite a few are at least 10,000 years old, and some much older. The real truth is that the tribal people of the Amazon still living in the forest are the last surviving edition of an ancient Original narrative in America.

 

Step 9: The Pericu

Genetic Connections In California

“Several dozen Pericu skulls,” which are normally stored at the “Regional Museum of La Paz in Baja California Sur in Mexico and the National Museum of Anthropology and History in Mexico City,” were recently allowed to be examined in detail.

“They turn out to be something far more enigmatic. What they are is still not entirely clear but they do not seem to be Amerind . . . Their closest relatives seem to be the Fuegians, the Australians, some Papua-New Guineans and the other populations of Pacific and Indian Ocean areas.

The men, who “normally went naked,” hunted with the assistance of woomeras to propel their wooden spears, which the Spanish referred to as “atlatls (spear throwers).” The observations and details supplied by the Spanish virtually echo the commentaries made by the British when they began to confiscate Australian Aboriginal tribal lands.

 

Step 10: Up and Down the South American Coast

Originals The First Colonist

It would seem the Aboriginal people were the first colonists, and it appears there is now only one remnant population of the Aboriginal descendants, which leads us to ask what happened. Some commentators, such as Lowell Ponte, accept Australia as the country of origin.

Professor Augusto Cardich (University De La Plata) is a respected authority on ancient cave art and is adamant he can detect an Aboriginal influence throughout Patagonia. He is insistent, that at Los Toldos and another Patagonian site, Estancia la Mana, the paintings (dating from 12,000 years B.P.) are “almost identical to those I saw in Australia.” The similarity was not confined to rock art paintings, as he noted “some engravings in Australia . . . which can also be seen here.

 Tierra Del Fuego.jpg

Step 11: Tierra Del Fuego

Original Connected Genetically To Brazil 

Dr. Hermann Klaatsch felt that the distinctive facial features and physique of the Indigenous people from southern tip of South America was due to the influence of Original genes. Remaining consistent to his belief that most strands of modern humans are Original, Klaatsch feels even though humanity’s base is Australia, the Original people did not progress intellectually and stagnated in their primitive ways and ignorance. It seems Klaatsch has no more respect for the Original cousins, dismissing them as being of the same stock and lacking in redeeming features. “The question is still full of puzzles, especially as regards the Yahgans of Tierra del Fuego, whose very primitive physical and cultural features remind us of the lowest known races of the Old World.” (58) We have learnt that whenever Klaatsch refers to what he believes to be the lowest or most primitive race in his book, that is ‘Klaatsch-speak’ for the Australian Original people.

Ignoring the rampant racism, the photographs Klaatsch took show people with a wide face, thick bones and noses that look decidedly Original, and are definitely not Asian. Nor are the contradictions limited to facial features. The people from the southern extremes are renowned for their robust physique and very tall stature, which again is not typical of the Asian race, but very much ‘par for the course’ for the people of Tierra del Fuego.

The Brazilian connection remains to this day because they retained viable numbers that protected their ancient Original lineage.

 

Step 12: Two Admissions of Error and one Common Solution: Australia

The Science Is Wrong & The Scientist Have Admitted It. Humans Did Not Originate From Africa

To an extent all of the drama and parting of the ways begins with a scientific paper published twenty-five years ago by Professor Allan Wilson and Rebecca Cann titled, “The Recent African Genesis of Humans.

The priorities are back to front here. Instead of an opening paragraph announcing the seminal discovery of how, where and when humanity originated, it is an outright declaration of intellectual superiority and boasting of their self-proclaimed victory over a lesser-form of scholarly pursuit. The article opens with a delineation between the unworthy and enlightened. “In the quest for the facts about human evolution, we molecular scientists have engaged in two major debates with the paleontologists.” Now setting out the two protagonists, it seems one has led us astray and the other towards the light, and the time is right to apportion blame and plaudits. “After 15 years of disagreement, we won that argument, when the paleontologists admitted we had been right and they had been wrong.”

What is revealing is that the word won is the only word in the joint paper that is deliberately highlighted with sloped italics. Being the pivotal part of the introductory sentence in the first paragraph, it is very apparent that the bickering and animosity it caused is a major issue.

That qualifier, as it turned out, was fortunate, because before the beginning of the last decade of the twentieth century both Cann and Wilson had recanted and were certain that it was in Australia, not Africa, humanity came into existence. The reason is simple, both of them had not personally examined Original blood and relied on genetic assumptions they found were false. Their paper and the ‘molecular clock’ they posted was reliant upon two assumptions that pertained only to the Original race: that their mtDNA is the youngest and least diverse (one-third that of the African mtDNA) and a belief that Australia was uninhabited until settled by Africans 50-60,000 years ago.

They were wrong and had the integrity to admit that mistake and tidy up the bad research and errors made. Cann was the first to see the error of their ways and in a sampling of the blood of “112 humans, including twelve Australian Aborigines (sic), all from Western Australia.” (65) She found that “mitochondrial DNA puts the origin of Homo sapiens much further back and indicates that the Australian Aborigines (sic) arose 400,000 years ago from two distinct lineages, far earlier than any other racial group.”

 

In Total …

So Eve is not African according Wilson and Cann, a date of genesis of no less than 400,000 years is proposed by Stringer, Wilson, Cann and what is another fascinating diversion, Slater also referred to the same date. There is also no doubt the Original mtDNA is the oldest and predates anything African by a considerable amount. An investigation of the mtDNA of a huge collection of over 600 vials of blood taken from full-descent Original men and women was conducted by Roy Simmons (Commonwealth Serum Laboratory), and he found no link between African and Australian genes and that the Original mtDNA is much older than the African gene.

The Russian researchers of Y Chromosomes are adamant that Adam is not African, which is merely the male version of the same female story. What has to be understood is that in combination all of these genetic studies cannot supply latitude and longitude, but it can give certainty in one exclusion, in that there is one continent where humanity did not evolve. All of this adds up to one absolute minus, Africa, and a possible plus, Australia.

Put it all Together

In prosecuting our case let it be known that we only have to validate one step out of twelve on our receding time-line to win the debate. If just one example of Original presence outside Australia is substantiated then the genetic door is open, as a boat did set sail and Original genes have become part of the heritage of whatever people or location is awarded the official stamp of approval. Moreover, once setting sail successfully why stop at one place when everywhere is reachable? For our critics to prevail in this debate Chris Stringer reluctantly admits must take place, all twelve steps have to be fully discredited for the Out-of-Africa theory to remain on its pedestal.

The awkward part of that hypothetical debate is that if Stringer was asked to adjudicate, he would have to decline and declare his bias towards the anti-Out-of-Africa camp. Since it was his paper and speech that openly challenged the accepted date and place in such unequivocal terms, Stringer must remain consistent to his own research and cast his vote against Africa and look elsewhere for an alternative.

Can we suggest to Stringer that in seeking a new set of global parameters he should first consult the Original Custodians of what is agreed to be the oldest culture in the world. A few words of guidance and context from a spokesperson of the First Day will provide the clarity in direction that is now lost in the genetic haze.

“They say we have been here for 60,000 years, but it is much longer. We have been here since the time before time began. We have come directly out of the Dreamtime of the great Creative Ancestors. We have lived and kept the earth as it was on the First Day. All other peoples of the world came from us.

 

(summary by Kaiyu Bayles)

Source (for full list of references click on link) http://forgottenorigin.com/2809-2

 

 

Can We Make Some Noise Online?

This is the launch of the official “Get The Full Picture” campaign, spreading much needed awareness about the upcoming referendum on Constitutional Recognition. Supported by grassroots activists across the country. 


Calling out to all our Grassroots mob to upload pics or videos

We  are going to need everyone to get involved if we have any chance of being heard. We are up against a multi million dollar “Vote Yes” campaign.

Smart Mob say “No Consent” To the Recognise Scam.
Don’t Let the Government hijack our Lands, Culture and Sovereignty for free!
See our urgent message stick here: https://www.facebook.com/VotenoToConstitutionalChange/photos/a.353446334725850.77935.350355421701608/1339022552834885/?type=3&theater

We will not defeat Recognise with just a few activists holding the front line. The Government recognise stooges are organised, they have millions of dollars of Government money, resources, they have media and paid foot soldiers. It requires people power to defeat such a grand scale scam. Recognition will undo all the benefits of Mabo 2 case in where our Sovereignty became recognised. The government will not recognise our sovereignty post the recognition referendum all they will recognise is their power over us and their rights to make laws for us at a unlimited capacity. Black funding, identified jobs, black housing, abstudy and even organisations will go down like a deck of cards. Merging of sovereigntys means assimilation which means all services are mainstreamed as so called ‘equal’. Closing the gap is really closing the distance to assimilation. Some activists have mobilised which is deadly now it’s time for everyone to rise up. This is the only chance right now to save Sovereignty that became lit up since Mabo 2.  

Domestic recognition is not Sovereignty it is ownership of property. https://www.facebook.com/only1alicehaines/posts/10212284377845037

Points to remember for the Message to get out there for those wanting to make a 1min video:
– $800 million spent on the CONstitutional reforms “Recognise” campaign.

– Stop the government of Australia commit further crimes against the tribes

 – ‘Recognise’ campaign is treacherous for First Nations People

– The government wants to name First Nations people in the constitution so they have more power over them. It will allow the government to discriminate on the basis of race.

– The proposed referendum on Constitutional Recognition is a farce. They do not have consent to dictate terms of this proposed amendment on our behalf, Australian Citizens again voting on what they believe to be best for the tribes. Nor do they have jurisdiction in this country. 

– It fails the test of compliance with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. It gives the government the power to pass legislation like the ‘Northern Territory Intervention’ against the First Nations people in all the states.

– The vote will give non-Indigenous people the power to make the decision on ‘Recognition’ (This is because they have 97% of the vote.

– ‘Sovereignty was never ceded’ – this legislation will make it much harder for people to assert their sovereign rights – in other words it will kill any chance of workable and grass roots self-determination.

– We have not been properly consulted on the wording of the proposed changes. So we won’t get a say on the finally wording or have the final vote being the minority in this country.

– There has been no funding or resources made available for the “Vote No” campaign. This is bias and undemocratic.

– The R campaign is run by (un-elected) people especially selected and funded by the government to promote Constitutional Reform.

– On 7th December, 2015 the government appointed a new council to promote Constitutional Reform to work independently to the ‘Expert Council’ , including some of the front line people from the ‘Expert Panel’, which was named ‘The Referendum Council’. This council includes more non-Indigenous people than the ‘Expert Panel’. The non-Indigenous members are leading right-wing Lawyers and media experts..

– The referendum meetings that are happening nationally as part of the so called “consultation process”, is invite only. These meetings are not transparent, open for all to have their say and are inviting mostly “Yes” voters to manipulate the outcome of the meetings to further push their agenda.

– National Meetings shutting us out
Please try get along to these meetings. 

Silence  is considered consent so we have to make noise. Even if it’s outside the meetings with some protest banners, bring your kids, mums, dads, aunties, uncles, grandparents, elders, cousins and friends to one of these assimilation authorisation meetings and let them know #NoConsent

 

10. Write to the Referendum Council members copying and pasting from our letter provided through the link. The members are: Co-Chaired by Ms Pat Anderson AO and Mr Mark Leibler AC. The other members of the Referendum Council are Professor Megan Davis, Mr Andrew Demetriou, Mr Murray Gleeson AC, Mr Mick Gooda, Mr Stan Grant, Ms Tanya Hosch, Professor Kristina Keneally, Ms Jane McAloon, Mr Michael Rose AM, Ms Natasha Stott Despoja AM, Mr Noel Pearson, Ms Amanda Vanstone, Ms Dalassa Yorkston and Dr Galarrwuy Yunupingu AM. The former Co-Chair, Professor Patrick Dodson, resigned as a Member of the Council on 2 March 2016.

11. You can also upload a video message or picture of yourself holding a sign with #VoteNoToConstitutionalChange to the Vote No to Constitutional Changes’ Facebook page
12. Share posts and keep the conversation going.
Vote No to Constitutional Changed 

Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/VotenoToConstitutionalChange

How To Make Your Vote Count On The Upcoming Referendum for Constitutional Change

Smart Mob say “No Consent” To the Recognise Scam.

Don’t Let the Government hijack our Lands, Culture and Sovereignty for free!
See our urgent message stick 
Summary of the concerns raised for the coming Referendum to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People in The British Act of Parliament called the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.
1. Acquiring jurisdiction 

– Acquiring Jurisdiction to apply Laws to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People is being sought through Section 51:xxvi and a so called consent process through the pathway of a Referendum. This pathway to Jurisdiction is an attempt to bypass a Treaty.

– Section 51:xxvi 

This law was designed for Alien races which means that anyone who is not an Australian citizen was considered alien and therefore foreign.  

– Consent from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People is being sought through The Referendum Council who “will advise the Prime Minister and Leader of the Opposition on progress and next steps towards a referendum to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Australian Constitution.” 

https://www.dpmc.gov.au/indigenous-affairs/constitutional-recognition/referendum-council
2. Control

– Right of consent for laws impacting us are removed

– Self determination will be forfeited and replaced with a Government Authority on all matters affecting Aboriginal and Torres strait Islander People.
3. Impacts

– Land desecration

– Land acquisition transferred to Government

– Sacred sites desecration

– Cultural Breaches

– Human Rights Breaches

– Higher incarceration

– Forced Assimilation
4. Binding Laws

– Recognition is a binding law due to the fact of the recognise definition which in The Black Laws Dictionary (Recognizance) means to enter into a bond 

– Recognition will be binding. The legislations will be binding.

Source: https://www.facebook.com/VotenoToConstitutionalChange/posts/1343741192363021
Ways you can get proactive and have your voice heard no matter where u are:
1. Take it to the Streets – hand out info

2. Print posters to pin to noticeboards in your area

3. Print pamphlets to hand to family and friends

4. Buy merchandise

5. Sign the petition

6. Add your name to the declaration of opposition

7. Join the online protests by changing your profile picture to support Vote No 

8. Turn up and make some noise at the national meetings

9. Fill in the online survey and send these fullas a message that we do not want to be recognised.

10. Write to the Referendum Council members copying and pasting from our letter provided through the link. The members are:  Co-Chaired by Ms Pat Anderson AO and Mr Mark Leibler AC. The other members of the Referendum Council are Professor Megan Davis, Mr Andrew Demetriou, Mr Murray Gleeson AC, Mr Mick Gooda, Mr Stan Grant, Ms Tanya Hosch, Professor Kristina Keneally, Ms Jane McAloon, Mr Michael Rose AM, Ms Natasha Stott Despoja AM, Mr Noel Pearson, Ms Amanda Vanstone, Ms Dalassa Yorkston and Dr Galarrwuy Yunupingu AM. The former Co-Chair, Professor Patrick Dodson, resigned as a Member of the Council on 2 March 2016.

11. You can also upload a video message or picture of yourself holding a sign with #VoteNoToConstitutionalChange to the Vote No to Constitutional Changes’ Facebook page

12. Share posts and keep the conversation going.

Vote No to Constitutional Change Facebook Pagehttps://www.facebook.com/VotenoToConstitutionalChange

Letter to each member of the Referendum Council

Co-Chaired by Ms Pat Anderson AO and Mr Mark Leibler AC. The other members of the Referendum Council are Professor Megan Davis, Mr Andrew Demetriou, Mr Murray Gleeson AC, Mr Mick Gooda, Mr Stan Grant, Ms Tanya Hosch, Professor Kristina Keneally, Ms Jane McAloon, Mr Michael Rose AM, Ms Natasha Stott Despoja AM, Mr Noel Pearson, Ms Amanda Vanstone, Ms Dalassa Yorkston and Dr Galarrwuy Yunupingu AM. The former Co-Chair, Professor Patrick Dodson.

Dear member,

First and foremost it is going against the old law to speak on behalf of other people and their land. 

The Constitutional Reform debate to Recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people has be ongoing from as early as 1965.

In a nutshell, Constitutional Recognition is all about trying to apply laws to Aboriginal people and target laws specifically to our race.

The fact that ‘Aboriginal’ people are not on the Constitution protects us from Discriminative Laws in which the Constitution has power to enforce with any race.  

Once the terminology ‘Aboriginal’ is placed into the Constitution the Government can then proceed with specific laws for our race only which are discriminative for equal Citizenship Rights.

We are not Citizens of Australia if our race is not included on the Constitution although we have Citizenship rights. However, inclusion will place us at risk of the remainder of the Constitution power of targeting laws specifically for our race only.

Sir Robert Menzies in 1965 told the Government in a Parliamentary Hearing that by not having Aboriginal People on the Constitution protects them against discriminatory laws.  

Since 1967 any Legislations made for ‘Aboriginal’ people are unlawful within the Constitution.

Reference: SPEECH BY THE RT. HON. SIR ROBERT MENZIES K.T.C.H.Q.C.M.P ON CONSTITUTION ALTERATION ( PARLIAMENT) BILL 1965 AND CONSTITUTION ALTERATION ( REPEAL OF SECTION 127 ) BILL 1965 Transcript

http://pmtranscripts.dpmc.gov.au/browse.php?did=1192

A “Yes Vote” is a vote for Her Majesty the Queen of Great Britain to be sole Sovereign over all the lands now known as Australia. It’s a way to maintain the fiction of Terra Nullius.

Summary of the concerns raised for the coming Referendum to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People in The British Act of Parliament called the Commonwealth of Australia 
Constitution Act.

1. Acquiring jurisdiction 

– Acquiring Jurisdiction to apply Laws to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People is being sought through Section 51:xxvi and a so called consent process through the pathway of a Referendum. This pathway to Jurisdiction is an attempt to bypass a Treaty.

– Section 51:xxvi 

This law was designed for Alien races which means that anyone who is not an Australian citizen was considered alien and therefore foreign.  

– Consent from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People is being sought through The Referendum Council who “will advise the Prime Minister and Leader of the Opposition on progress and next steps towards a referendum to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Australian Constitution.” https://www.dpmc.gov.au/indigenous-affairs/constitutional-recognition/referendum-council

2. Control

– Right of consent for laws impacting us are removed

– Self determination will be forfeited and replaced with a Government Authority on all matters affecting Aboriginal and Torres strait Islander People.

3. Impacts

– Land desecration

– Land acquisition transferred to Government

– Sacred sites desecration

– Cultural Breaches

– Human Rights Breaches

– Higher incarceration

– Forced Assimilation

4. Binding Laws

– Recognition is a binding law due to the fact of the recognise definition which in The Black Laws Dictionary (Recognizance) means to enter into a bond 

– Recognition will be binding. The legislations will be binding.

Source: https://www.facebook.com/VotenoToConstitutionalChange/posts/1343741192363021

The Government lied to you last Referendum and they are lying to you again!

All Australians Voted ‘yes’ to enable ‘Interventions’ and not Citizenship for Aboriginal People.

The Government lied to ALL Australians and took them as fools for deceitful purposes.

“What was Australia’s 1967 Referendum about?

There are common misconceptions about what the 1967 Referendum actually changed.

What the referendum was about?

The 1967 Referendum proposed to include Aboriginal people in the census. (only)
The 1967 Referendum proposed to allow the Commonwealth government to make laws for Aboriginal people. (Future Interventions)

What the 1967 Referendum was not about?

The 1967 Referendum did not give Aboriginal people the right to vote. This right was already introduced in 1962.
The 1967 Referendum did not grant them citizenship.”

Do Not Trust Government Cons such as Reconciliation and their heftily funded campaign ‘R’ ‘Recognise’.  

For this time they want to steal Sovereignty permanently.

You do not speak for me. We Vote ‘NO’ To Constitutional Change.

Source: http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/history/australian-1967-referendum

Attachments:- 

10 Reasons to Vote No download
See pamphlet also 
Instructions: copy message, paste into ur email and edit. Copy email addresses and copy into your address bar of the email. 

Members include

Email addresses for members of the Referendum Council constitutionalrecognition@pmc.gov.au

Co-Chairs Ms Pat Anderson AO c/-admin@lowitja.org.au 

Mark Leibler AC mleibler@abl.com.au 

The other members of the Referendum Council are Professor 

Megan Davis megan.davis@unsw.edu.au

Andrew Demetriou c/- info@saxton.com.au

Murray Gleeson AC c/- enquiries@hcourt.gov.au

Mick Gooda communications@humanrights.gov.au

Stan Grant c/- publicity@skynews.com.au

Tanya Hosch c/- communications@humanrights.gov.au

Professor Kristina Keneally c/- peter@wallmedia.com.au

Jane McAloon c/- sydney@gresham.com.au

Michael Rose AM Michael.Rose@allens.com.au

Natasha Stott Despoja AM c/- info@wla.edu.au

Noel Pearson c/- info@cyp.org.au

Amanda Vanstone c/- info@saxton.com.au

Dalassa Yorkston ceo@torres.qld.gov.au

Dr Galarrwuy Yunupingu AM

admin@garmafestival.com.au 

The former Co-Chair Professor Patrick Dodson senator.dodson@aph.gov.au
Contact RECOGNISE – recognise@unitee.com.au
 

Get The Full Picture 

Fight Fire with Fire – time to really support the work of our Grassroots Vote No Campaign n support our Grassroots mob who work to get the message out. Like brother Whanjullah-imbala Palm Island-bwgcolman Buddah in Sydney we need to take our message to the streets. 

Recognise- GET THE FULL PUCTURE

We have a petition, pamphlets, 10 reasons to vote no information sheets, a callout for videos from grassroots campaigners posted on vote no page warning mob of the dangers, upcoming online protest with changing profile pics and using hashtags, speaking up at national meetings that Recognise mob organise, fill in their online form, add your name to the declaration to oppose the Recognise scam and write to all blackfullas on the R team as a group of grassroots activist telling them how we feel and maybe include info sheet and pamphlet “10 reasons to vote no”. A GoFundMe has been suggested, maybe time for paid facebooks adverts and we definitely need a song which is also in the pipeline. 

Now all we need is our grassroots lobby team to drive this…. who’s in?

Takin it to the streets – Brother Whanjullah-imbala Palm Island-bwgcolman Buddah here in the pics on the streets of Sydney

How to make your voice count

Take it to the Streets-  Just like Brother Whanjullah-imbala Palm Island-bwgcolman Buddah is doin here in the pics on the streets of Sydney. Maybe during a market in ur area or the busiest day of the week, set up with posters and info and just spread the message. 

2. Print posters to pin to noticeboards in your area
Vote No To Constitutional Recognition Pamphlet– click to download 

3. Print pamphlets to hand to family and friends – http://files.sovereignty.webnode.com/200000259-d2bdad3b86/vote%20no%20pamphlet.pdf

Sydney Supporter


Brother Whanjullah-imbala Palm Island-bwgcolman Buddah

Your shop for all your Vote No Merch
4. Buy merchandise to get the message heard and to support the Grassroots Campaign to Vote No:

5. Sign the petition 

6. Or if your like us and whole heartedly oppose the tribes being skull dragged under the crown, add your name to the declaration of opposition – 

7. Join the online protests by using this as your profile picture with hashtag in caption:

  #VoteNoToConstitutionalChange

Please help us make some noise using what we have and make this pic your profile pic. We need everyone if we are going to get the message out of the dangers of this multi million dollar Government campaig callled Recognise.
National Meetings shutting us out

8. Turn up and make some noise at the national meetings. Please make some protest banners and bring your kids, mums, dads, aunties, uncles, grandparents, elders, cousins and friends to one of these assimilation authorisation meetings and let them know #NoConsent

Broome 10-12 February 2017

Dubbo 17-19 February 2017

Darwin 22-24 February 2017

Perth 3-5 March 2017

Sydney 10-12 March 2017

Melbourne 17-19 March 2017

Cairns 24-26 March 2017

Ross River 31 March – 2 April 2017

Adelaide 7-9 April 2017

Brisbane 21-23 April 2017

Torres Strait 5-7 May 2017

Uluru – National Convention 24-26 May 

2017 Referendum for Constitutional Recognition – This is a clear message, the government has no jurisdiction and have no consent from the tribes.

See our urgent message stick here
Please download Vote ‘NO’ To Constitutional Change pamphlet to print out and hand around.

And please warn everybody about what the dangers of assimilation without rights are.

1. Print page 1 on the front

2. Print page 2 on the back

3. Fold into 3 sections

4. Hand around
Download file here http://sovereignty.webnode.com/products/vote-no-to-constitutional-change-pamphlet/ 


Make your voice count!

9. Everyone please click on this link and send these guys a message that we do not want to be recognised! https://referendumcouncil.org.au/join-the-conversation.

Then screenshot and upload and tag Vote ‘NO’ To Constitutional Change

Then hashtag #GetTheFullPicture #No to #Recognise  #VoteNo #VoteNoToConstitutionalChange

Make Big Noise outside the meetings if they refuse to let you in to the meetings in your area. 

10: Write to the Referendum Council members and let them know we do not consent to them speaking on behalf of us and give the reasons why we are voting no to the Con. Co-Chaired by Ms Pat Anderson AO and Mr Mark Leibler AC. The other members of the Referendum Council are Professor Megan Davis, Mr Andrew Demetriou, Mr Murray Gleeson AC, Mr Mick Gooda, Mr Stan Grant, Ms Tanya Hosch, Professor Kristina Keneally, Ms Jane McAloon, Mr Michael Rose AM, Ms Natasha Stott Despoja AM, Mr Noel Pearson, Ms Amanda Vanstone, Ms Dalassa Yorkston and Dr Galarrwuy Yunupingu AM. The former Co-Chair, Professor Patrick Dodson, resigned as a Member of the Council on 2 March 2016.

11. You can also upload a video message or picture of yourself holding a sign with #VoteNoToConstitutionalChange to the Vote No to Constitutional Changes’ Facebook page – https://www.facebook.com/VotenoToConstitutionalChange/

Urgent Message To Every Blackfulla In The Country

Notice: Government of Australia must vacate this land. You are operating Persona non Grata – aliens who are not welcome. 

Recognise is the last nail in the coffin to give them total power. 

“Once they have administrative control, they have complete power and they don’t need to act in accordance to the law.” 

Gary Lilienthal, Ph.D. professor of law 


(Non Est Factum means they get you to sign something that you think is one thing but its actually another. It is fraud, and if you say that to the official,once they realise you think it’s non est factum they can’t force you to sign anything).

watch Prof Gary Lilienthal confirming what Alice Haines’s saying here

– He appears at 25:30 31:30 

Through section 116, they will get away with making more discriminatory laws.

Through the heritage act they have the right to dig up our bodies in part or in whole.
Enter our houses without a warrant.


This is what they have been doing for thousands of years, it’s the old Roman Empire system.


Treason- the crime of betraying one’s country, especially by attempting to kill or overthrow the sovereign or government

Time to get the message out!
They are trying to fraudulently take ownership of everything of ours as an ancient people. 
They are claiming total immunity from possible legal action too:


Two laws cannot operate in any country, we have had our own law of the land for thousands of years. You do not have consent of the first inhabitants to practice your law and system here. 


The Cold War, genocidal tactics used in this country for the past two centuries is nothing short of treason. This is an order to cease and desist your trickery in the form of policy and law that is killing our people. We the Sovereign Tribes of Australia have grounds to sue the crown and it’s agents under the tort of Misfeasance- a transgression, especially the wrongful exercise of lawful authority.


– 31:30 in video. Non Est Factum means they get you to sign something that you think is one thing but its actually another. 
It is fraud, and if you say that to the official,once they realise you think it’s non est factum they can’t force you to sign anything.

Our message to the illegal, fraudulent Australian Government, the crowns and all its agents: We are Sovereigns, you have no consent, no jurisdiction, no deals can be done legitimately as your instruments are non est factum. We do not understand your codified language and do not willingly comply.  The tribes are being held under duress by the crown to fleece us of our precious mother land and her resources.

We should be filing a lawsuit against the queen, the crown and its agents for the genocidal Cold War and acts against humanity. This is something for us all to think about and talk about at home with mob.

For now, I’m making my teenage kids watch this and will get some fight back music happening soon. If you can translate this message into your language pls let us know as this is an urgent message for all Blackfullas everywhere. 

Time to come together as 1 urgently.

Urgent message to every blackfulla in the country, please listen: 

Goomeroi woman Alice Haines proves Oz Gov defrauding tribes

Love n respect xo
Kaiyu Bayles

 Uncle Kevin Buzzacott message to everyone

Uncle Kevin Buzzacott, Arabunna, South Australia forward a message via Honey Pynor stressing how important it is for the Elders to come together in a great Peace Meeting and Ceremony with the Old People in front of the whole country and for it to be broadcast.

Previous Older Entries Next Newer Entries